Search found 10 matches
- Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:14 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Encrytpred Subscribe/Publish
- Replies: 0
- Views: 23745
Encrytpred Subscribe/Publish
Hello, I'm trying to use Ssl (Schannel) with RCF-2.2.0.0 (TcpEndpoint and HttpEnpoint) Connections from client to the server are perfectly encrypted, but the published event go from the server to client in the plain form. Checked with WireShark. Should it be expected? publisherPtr->publish().setTran...
- Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Publish/subscribe over UDP
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7189
Re: Publish/subscribe over UDP
Thank you Jarl,
The idea is brilliant! I will go that way most probably.
Thanks for your time,
Konstantin
The idea is brilliant! I will go that way most probably.
Thanks for your time,
Konstantin
- Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:51 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Publish/subscribe over UDP
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7189
Publish/subscribe over UDP
Hi, I’m trying to subscribe to RCF::RcfServer( RCF::UdpEndpoint() ) and the client fails in createSubscription with ‘Exception type: class std::bad_cast. Exception message: "Bad dynamic_cast!".’ Using RCF::enableLogging(RCF::LogToDebugWindow(), 2) I’ve found the problem starts in UdpServerTransport:...
- Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:19 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Removing Endpoint from the server.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8560
Re: Removing Endpoint from the server.
Thank you very much for the swift reply Jarl, The Metro “life” brings a lot of surprises every day. >1) Can you listen on 0.0.0.0 instead? Would be too insecure. If so, the server will be connectable worldwide. I would have to play with SSL on the both sides. Maybe I will have to go that way finally...
- Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:30 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Removing Endpoint from the server.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8560
Removing Endpoint from the server.
Hi, I’m trying to connect a Merto/Windows8 tile/WindowsStore client application with locally installed RCF server. The problem is Metro applications are generally not allowed to communicate via localhost. There is no sense to discuss “why so”. It’s just one of the Microsoft limitations. So, I’m tryi...
- Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:12 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: RCF for Windows without sockets
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10195
Re: RCF for Windows without sockets
Jarl,
I'll be back. I just need to finish the process and pass through the certification kit.
By the way, named pipes are not allowed for Metro apps as well.
Yours,
Konstantin.
I'll be back. I just need to finish the process and pass through the certification kit.
By the way, named pipes are not allowed for Metro apps as well.
Yours,
Konstantin.
- Mon Jul 29, 2013 10:25 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: RCF for Windows without sockets
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10195
Re: RCF for Windows without sockets
Hi Jarl, >I didn't realize that Metro apps were this restrictive with the Windows API. Actually extremely restrictive, most of the kernel32.dll calls are disallowed, all the others are to be used via new metro API. Such calls are provided by so called run time broker (the integral part of metro sand...
- Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:15 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: RCF for Windows without sockets
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10195
RCF for Windows without sockets
Hi, I’m trying to implement an RCF client in Metro/Windows Store application. The related application certification process prohibits the use of windows sockets, so I may not link ws2_32.lib and mswsock.lib at least. ...................personal environmental explanations, can be skipped................
- Tue May 28, 2013 10:08 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: RCF::ByteBuffer and copy semantics
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8321
Re: RCF::ByteBuffer and copy semantics
Thank you very much.
I should guess myself about the RCF::ByteBuffer buffer( sizeof(v6addr) ) + memcpy pair, but I did not unfortunately, was just perplexed by the "no-copy semantics" announcement.
Thank you once more,
Konstantin
I should guess myself about the RCF::ByteBuffer buffer( sizeof(v6addr) ) + memcpy pair, but I did not unfortunately, was just perplexed by the "no-copy semantics" announcement.
Thank you once more,
Konstantin
- Mon May 27, 2013 2:35 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: RCF::ByteBuffer and copy semantics
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8321
RCF::ByteBuffer and copy semantics
I tried to use RCF::ByteBuffer to serialize a part of complex structure as below Trying to simplify the things, so skipping unrelated details // an entity class CZoneRule {.... in6_addr v6addr; ...}; // list of the entities class CZoneRuleList : private std::vector<CZoneRule*>{ }; // actually more c...