Search found 238 matches
- Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:38 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Cancel long-term RCF functions.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4890
Re: Cancel long-term RCF functions.
From the client side, you can cancel the call in two ways: 1) If you are doing a synchronous RPC, you can put in a progress callback, and when the client wants to cancel, throw an exception from the progress callback. This will disconnect the client and the exception will be passed on to your own ex...
- Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:41 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Session bindings using RCF 2.0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5168
Re: Session bindings using RCF 2.0
That is correct Spino. SessionObjectFactoryService is deprecated in 2.0, and will eventually be dropped in future versions. In RCF 2.0, you should use RcfSession::createSessionObject<>() etc, to keep track of per-connection state. See this section in the user guide for more information: http://www.d...
- Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:30 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Configuration macro mismatch leads to ungracious termination
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6222
Re: Configuration macro mismatch leads to ungracious termina
Due to how the RCF_USE_BOOST_SERIALIZATION define is used, it's difficult to detect a mismatch at runtime. However, I've added code to the RCF initialization functions to trigger a linker error if there there is a mismatch, and that should take care of things. We should have a new build out for you,...
- Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:12 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: RCF and boost.test
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5747
Re: RCF and boost.test
I'm not sure what's going on here. The boost.test code is almost impenetrable. The problem is that when the test fails, it is trying to print out the failed value, thus evaluating the arguments again and causing a second (failing) remote call. The client.Echo() call returns a special proxy object (R...
- Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:39 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Configuration macro mismatch leads to ungracious termination
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6222
Re: Configuration macro mismatch leads to ungracious termina
First off, I'm leaning towards just throwing an exception, instead of dereferencing the NULL pointer... Do you have a stack trace of the null pointer?
Triggering a linker error to detect mismatches at build-time, is definitely a good idea too - I'll have a look at what we can do there.
Triggering a linker error to detect mismatches at build-time, is definitely a good idea too - I'll have a look at what we can do there.
- Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:37 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Possible memory leak on thread pool
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4827
Re: Possible memory leak on thread pool
I suspect you are seeing the buffer caching that RCF does in the background. RCF reuses network send and receive buffers, rather than asking the OS to allocate new ones. To disable the caching, call ObjectPool::setBufferCountLimit() before starting your server: #include <RCF/ObjectPool.hpp> // ... R...
- Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:35 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Boost 1.53 smart pointer changes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7356
Re: Boost 1.53 smart pointer changes
A new build is out, that fixes this issue:
http://www.deltavsoft.com/downloads/RCF-2.0.0.2678.zip
http://www.deltavsoft.com/downloads/RCF ... 678.tar.gz
Release notes are available here:
http://www.deltavsoft.com/doc/rcf_user_ ... Notes.html
http://www.deltavsoft.com/downloads/RCF-2.0.0.2678.zip
http://www.deltavsoft.com/downloads/RCF ... 678.tar.gz
Release notes are available here:
http://www.deltavsoft.com/doc/rcf_user_ ... Notes.html
- Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:55 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Boost 1.53 smart pointer changes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7356
Re: Boost 1.53 smart pointer changes
Meanwhile, you can just change 'shared_static_cast' to 'static_pointer_cast' ... Boost 1.53.0 has deprecated shared_static_cast.
- Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:47 pm
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Boost 1.53 smart pointer changes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7356
Re: Boost 1.53 smart pointer changes
Thanks for reporting this. We'll be putting out a new build shortly, to fix it.
- Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:33 am
- Forum: Support - RCF
- Topic: Question about client progress callback
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8476
Re: Question about client progress callback
Yep, I thought about suggesting that - glad you got it working.